I mentioned early in Pelosi's reign some statements she made that irked me and made me dislike her. However, I am able to at least understand why she would have said them. But even in my attacks leveled in her direction I never stooped so low as to "out" her against her will. Not so John Nichols. This weirdo not only writes a barely comprehensible non-sequiters...he "outs" her with this statement:
As such, the decision by Pelosi and his allies
HIS? Nice work there John boy.
Planning Summerfield
-
We are playing Summerfield. It is a pretty soft course, looks like a 116
slope, 2300ish yards. 6 par 4s, 3 par 3s, par 33 course. I have played it
several...
5 years ago
2 comments:
Accuracy obviously isn't his strong point.
"...the fact that it was not explicitly barred gave the administration all the room it required to claim the power to disregard the Constitution and the rule of law."
So it bothers him when a republican president does that, but not when congress, judges or a democratic president does? Very interesting.
Post a Comment